
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
西安交通大学化工学院,陕西 西安 710049
Received:11 September 2025,
Revised:2025-10-20,
Published:28 February 2026
移动端阅览
陈万生, 齐随涛, 周一鸣, 等. 有机液体规模化氢储运技术经济分析[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2026, 15(2): 658-669.
CHEN Wansheng, QI Suitao, ZHOU Yiming, et al. Techno-economic analysis of large-scale hydrogen storage and transportation via liquid organic hydrogen carriers[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2026, 15(2): 658-669.
陈万生, 齐随涛, 周一鸣, 等. 有机液体规模化氢储运技术经济分析[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2026, 15(2): 658-669. DOI: 10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2025.0830.
CHEN Wansheng, QI Suitao, ZHOU Yiming, et al. Techno-economic analysis of large-scale hydrogen storage and transportation via liquid organic hydrogen carriers[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2026, 15(2): 658-669. DOI: 10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2025.0830.
氢能产业的发展是我国实现能源转型、达成“双碳”目标的重要途径,然而氢气的低密度、易泄漏及易致金属脆化等特性,导致其高效、安全储运仍面临技术瓶颈,亟待发展经济可行的大规模储运方案。本研究系统评述了现有氢储运技术的优势、局限与发展趋势,通过比较分析,提出有机液体(liquid organic hydrogen carrier
LOHC)氢储运技术因其高储氢密度、安全性和可利用现有油品储运设施等优势,在大规模、长距离氢储运中展现出独特潜力。通过构建涵盖运输规模、距离、载体类型和运输方式的多参数氢储运成本分析模型,比较了三种有机液体氢储运体系在不同场景下的经济性,并进一步对关键参数进行了经济敏感性分析。经济分析表明,在所选用的三种有机液态氢载体中,DBT/H
18
-DBT体系的氢储运平准化成本较TOL/MCH、NEC/H
12
-NEC体系低11%~34%,是理想的储氢载体,海运运输成本低于陆运1/3,是更适合有机液体的运输方式;敏感性分析表明工艺能耗与燃料成本是影响有机液体经济性的关键敏感因素,是技术优化的重点方向。最后,将有机液体氢储运技术与其他主流氢储运技术的平准化成本进行比较,明确了各技术的适用边界与市场定位。本研究为有机液体氢储运技术的规模化应用提供了系统的技术经济分析框架,为氢能商业化储运路径选择提供了理论依据和数据支撑。
The development of the hydrogen energy industry is a crucial pathway for China to achieve energy transition and fulfill its dual-carbon goals. However
the intrinsic properties of hydrogen
including low density
high leakage risk
and susceptibility to metal embrittlement
pose significant challenges to its safe and efficient storage and transportation. Consequently
there is an urgent need to develop economicall
y viable solutions for large-scale hydrogen storage and transport. This paper systematically reviews the advantages and limitations of existing hydrogen storage and transportation technologies and identifies liquid organic hydrogen carrier (LOHC) technology as one of the most promising options for large-scale
long-distance hydrogen delivery. By establishing a multi-parameter cost analysis model
this study quantitatively evaluates the effects of transport scale
transport distance
carrier type
and transport mode on the techno-economic performance of LOHC systems and further conducts sensitivity analysis of key parameters. The results indicate that
among the three LOHC systems examined
the DBT/H
18
-DBT system achieves a levelized hydrogen storage and transportation cost that is 11%—34% lower than those of the TOL/MCH and NEC/H
12
-NEC systems
identifying it as the optimal hydrogen carrier. In addition
maritime transportation costs for LOHCs are less than one-third of land transportation costs
demonstrating that shipping is the more suitable transport mode for organic liquid-based hydrogen. Sensitivity analysis reveals that process energy consumption and fuel cost are the dominant factors affecting LOHC economics
providing clear directions for technological optimization. Comparative analysis further confirms that the DBT/H
18
-DBT system maintains strong cost competitiveness and stability across different transport scales
offering a feasible technological pathway for the future commercialization of hydrogen storage and transportation.
孟翔宇, 陈铭韵, 顾阿伦, 等. "双碳" 目标下中国氢能发展战略[J]. 天然气工业, 2022, 42(4): 156-179. DOI:10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2022.04.015.
MENG X Y, CHEN M Y, GU A L, et al. China's hydrogen development strategy in the context of double carbon targets[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2022, 42(4): 156-179. DOI:10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2022.04.015.
BALL M, WIETSCHEL M. The future of hydrogen—Opportunities and challenges[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2009, 34(2): 615-627. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.11.014.
李敬法, 李建立, 王玉生, 等. 氢能储运关键技术研究进展及发展趋势探讨[J]. 油气储运, 2023, 42(8): 856-871. DOI:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2023.08.002.
LI J F, LI J L, WANG Y S, et al. Research progress and development trends of key technologies for hydrogen energy storage and transportation[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2023, 42(8): 856-871. DOI:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2023.08.002.
MUTHUKUMAR P, KUMAR A, AFZAL M, et al. Review on large-scale hydrogen storage systems for better sustainability[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2023, 48(85): 33223-33259. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.04.304.
冯展博, 孟凡玉. 氢能储运技术优缺点比较分析及未来发展探讨[J]. 能源技术与管理, 2023, 48(4): 30-33. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-9943.2023.04.009.
FENG Z B, MENG F Y. Comparative analysis and future development discussion on hydrogen energy storage and transportation technology[J]. Energy Technology and Management, 2023, 48(4): 30-33. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-9943. 2023.04.009.
张仲军, 金子儿, 曾玥, 等. 我国氢能规模化储运方式经济性分析[J]. 中国能源, 2023, 45(12): 27-37.
ZHANG Z J, JIN Z E, ZENG Y, et al. Economic analysis of large-scale hydrogen energy storage and transportation in China[J]. Energy of China, 2023, 45(12): 27-37.
Gev scoping study delivers zero emission supply chain for green hydrogen[R]. Australia: Global Energy Ventures, 2021.
D'AMORE-DOMENECH R, LEO T J, POLLET B G. Bulk power transmission at sea: Life cycle cost comparison of electricity and hydrogen as energy vectors[J]. Applied Energy, 2021, 288: 116625. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116625.
COMER B, GEORGEFF E, STOLZ D, et al. Decarbonizing bulk carriers with hydrogen fuel cells and wind-assisted propulsion: A modeled case study analysis[R]. Washington: International Council on Clean Transportation, 2022.
RIVARD E, TRUDEAU M, ZAGHIB K, et al. Hydrogen storage for mobility: A review[J]. Materials, 2019, 12(12): DOI:10.3390/ma12121973.
Onboard Type IV compressed hydrogen storage system-Cost and performance status[R]. Washington: U.S. Department of Energy, 2025.
ZHOU L. Progress and problems in hydrogen storage methods[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2005, 9(4): 395-408. DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2004.05.005.
王惠颖. 氢气长输管道技术现状分析[J]. 机电产品开发与创新, 2025, 38(4): 80-82. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-6673.2025.04.025.
WANG H Y. Analysis of the current situation of hydrogen long-distance pipeline technology[J]. Development & Innovation of Machinery & Electrical Products, 2025, 38(4): 80-82. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-6673.2025.04.025.
陈昌华, 贺杨, 李春洋, 等. 高压加氢闸阀的失效模式分析及研究[J]. 阀门, 2024(8): 990-993. DOI:10.16630/j.cnki.1002-5855.2024.08.006.
CHEN C H, HE Y, LI C Y, et al. Failure analysis and improvement plan of high-pressure hydrogenation gate valve[J]. Chinese Journal of Valve, 2024(8): 990-993. DOI:10.16630/j.cnki.1002-5855.2024.08.006.
Natural Gas with Hydrogen Pipeline Cost Model. Model results and comparative analysis[R]. Washington: U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management (FECM), 2024.
刘晓杰, 刘峻, 韩文杰, 等. 储氢技术研究进展及挑战与机遇[J]. 现代化工, 2025, 45(8): 79-84, 89. DOI:10.16606/j.cnki.issn0253-4320.2025.08.015.
LIU X J, LIU J, HAN W J, et al. An overview of hydrogen storage technologies: Research progress, challenges, and opportunities[J]. Modern Chemical Industry, 2025, 45(8): 79-84, 89. DOI:10.16606/j.cnki.issn0253-4320.2025.08.015.
刘彪, 白海强, 康玲, 等. 固态储氢材料研究进展[J]. 低碳化学与化工, 2025, 50(7): 125-135, 144. DOI:10.12434/j.issn.2097-2547.20240373.
LIU B, BAI H Q, KANG L, et al. Research progress on solid hydrogen storage materials[J]. Low-Carbon Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, 2025, 50(7): 125-135, 144. DOI:10.12434/j.issn.2097-2547.20240373.
吕翠, 王金阵, 朱伟平, 等. 氢液化技术研究进展及能耗分析[J]. 低温与超导, 2019, 47(7): 11-18. DOI:10.16711/j.1001-7100.2019.07.003.
LYU C, WANG J Z, ZHU W P, et al. Research progress and energy consumption analysis of hydrogen liquefaction technology[J]. Cryogenics and Superconductivity, 2019, 477: 11-18. DOI:10.16711/j.1001-7100.2019.07.003.
MACHAJ K, KUPECKI J, MALECHA Z, et al. Ammonia as a potential marine fuel: A review[J]. Energy Strategy Reviews, 2022, 44: 100926. DOI:10.1016/j.esr.2022.100926.
熊景阳, 贺星, 梁前超. 船舶领域氨制氢技术研究进展[J]. 舰船电子工程, 2023, 43(11): 18-20, 26. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-9730.2023.11.004.
XIONG J Y, HE X, LIANG Q C. Research progress of ammonia hydrogen production technology in ship field[J]. Ship Electronic Engineering, 2023, 43(11): 18-20, 26. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-9730.2023.11.004.
WU C L, JIN Y, FAN Y Y, et al. Membrane reactor supported by MXene (Ti 3 C 2 T x ) for hydrogen production by ammonia decomposition[J ] . Energy & Fuels, 2023, 37(13): 9760-9769.
王明华. 氢能储运技术经济性分析及建立绿氨储运基地设想[J]. 现代化工, 2023, 43(6): 1-5. DOI:10.16606/j.cnki.issn0253-4320. 2023.06.001.
WANG M H. Economic analysis on hydrogen energy storage and transportation technologies and tentative plan in establishing a green ammonia storage-transportation base[J]. Modern Chemical Industry, 2023, 43(6): 1-5. DOI:10.16606/j.cnki.issn0253-4320. 2023.06.001.
JORSCHICK H, GEIßELBRECHT M, EßL M, et al. Benzyltoluene/dibenzyltoluene-based mixtures as suitable liquid organic hydrogen carrier systems for low temperature applications[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(29): 14897-14906. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.03.210.
ABDIN Z, TANG C G, LIU Y, et al. Large-scale stationary hydrogen storage via liquid organic hydrogen carriers[J ] . iScience, 2021, 24(9): 102966. DOI:10.1016/j.isci.2021.102966.
WULF C, ZAPP P. Assessment of system variations for hydrogen transport by liquid organic hydrogen carriers[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43(26): 11884-11895. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.01.198.
邢承治, 赵明, 尚超, 等. 有机液体载氢储运技术研究进展及应用场景[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(2): 643-651. DOI:10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2023.0523.
XING C Z, ZHAO M, SHANG C, et al. Research progress and application scenarios of storage and transportation technology with liquid organic hydrogen carrier[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2024, 13(2): 643-651. DOI:10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2023.0523.
石利斌, 彭东岳, 李云鹏, 等. 有机液体储氢体系以及脱氢催化剂研究进展[J]. 石油学报(石油加工), 2025, 41(1): 89-103. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-8719.2025.01.010.
SHI L B, PENG D Y, LI Y P, et al. Research progress of liquid organic hydrogen carrier system and dehydrogenation catalysts[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica (Petroleum Processing Section), 2025, 41(1): 89-103. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-8719.2025.01.010.
YANG M, DONG Y, FEI S X, et al. A comparative study of catalytic dehydrogenation of perhydro-N-ethylcarbazole over noble metal catalysts[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39(33): 18976-18983. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.09.123.
ZHOU Y M, QI S T, TAN X, et al. Regulating the Pt dispersion by increasing the specific surface area of Al 2 O 3 support for perhydro-dibenzyltoluene catalytic dehydrogenation reaction[J ] . International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 57: 52-59. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.12.034.
TUO Y X, MENG Y, CHEN C, et al. Partial positively charged Pt in Pt/MgAl 2 O 4 for enhanced dehydrogenation activity[J ] . Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2021, 288: 119996. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.119996.
SHI L B, ZHOU Y M, TAN X, et al. Dielectric barrier discharge plasma grafting carboxylate groups on Pt/Al 2 O 3 catalysts for highly efficient hydrogen release from perhydro-dibenzyltoluene[J ] . Catalysis Science & Technology, 2022, 12(5): 1441-1449.
MURATA K, KURIMOTO N, YAMAMOTO Y, et al. Structure-property relationships of Pt-Sn nanoparticles supported on Al 2 O 3 for the dehydrogenation of methylcyclohexane[J ] . ACS Applied Nano Materials, 2021, 4(5): 4532-4541.
MERCHANT A, BATZNER S, SCHOENHOLZ S S, et al. Scaling deep learning for materials discovery[J]. Nature, 2023, 624(7990): 80-85. DOI:10.1038/s41586-023-06735-9.
CHU C Y, WU K, LUO B B, et al. Hydrogen storage by liquid organic hydrogen carriers: Catalyst, renewable carrier, and technology—A review[J]. Carbon Resources Conversion, 2023, 6(4): 334-351. DOI:10.1016/j.crcon.2023.03.007.
李默宇, 梁胜彪, 孟庆云, 等. 碳纤维湿法缠绕用高模量高韧性环氧树脂基体[J]. 玻璃钢/复合材料, 2009(2): 72-77. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0999.2009.02.018.
LI M Y, LIANG S B, MENG Q Y, et al. Toughness epoxy resin with high modulus for carbon fiber wet filamemt winding[J]. Fiber Reinforced Plastics/Composites, 2009(2): 72-77. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0999.2009.02.018.
罗渊, 刘强, 王源鑫, 等. 空心玻璃微球储氢研究进展[J]. 功能材料, 2023, 54(6): 6011-6020. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-9731.2023.06.002.
LUO Y, LIU Q, WANG Y X, et al. Recent development of hydrogen storage in hollow glass microspheres[J]. Journal of Functional Materials, 2023, 54(6): 6011-6020. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-9731.2023.06.002.
ARIHARAN A, VISWANATHAN B, NANDHAKUMAR V. Nitrogen-incorporated carbon nanotube derived from polystyrene and polypyrrole as hydrogen storage material[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43(10): 5077-5088. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.01.110.
王奥诚, 王春雅, 徐春明, 等. 液态有机氢载体体系及其加氢-脱氢催化剂研究进展[J/OL]. 石油学报(石油加工), 2025, 1-18. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.2129.TE.20250616.1432.002.
WANG A, WANG C, XU C, et al. Research progress in liquid organic hydrogen carrier systems and their hydrogenation-dehydrogenation catalysts[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica (Petroleum Processing Section), 2025, 1-18. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.2129.TE.20250616.1432.002.
TSOGT N, GBADAGO D Q, HWANG S. Exploring the potential of liquid organic hydrogen carrier (LOHC) system for efficient hydrogen storage and Transport: A Techno-Economic and energy analysis perspective[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2024, 299: 117856. DOI:10.1016/j.enconman.2023.117856.
RONG Y, CHEN S Y, LI C J, et al. Techno-economic analysis of hydrogen storage and transportation from hydrogen plant to terminal refueling station[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 52: 547-558. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.01.187.
LINDFORS L P, SALMI T, SMEDS S. Kinetics of toluene hydrogenation on Ni/Al 2 O 3 catalyst[J ] . Chemical Engineering Science, 1993, 48(22): 3813-3828. DOI:10.1016/0009-2509(93)80224-E.
HAMAYUN M H, HUSSAIN M, MAAFA I M, et al. Integration of hydrogenation and dehydrogenation system for hydrogen storage and electricity generation-simulation study[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(36): 20213-20222. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.06.053.
SHI J M, BAI X F. In situ preparation of ultrafine Ru nanocatalyst supported on nitrogen-doped layered double hydroxide by nitrogen glow discharge plasma for catalytic hydrogenation of N-ethylcarbaz ole[J ] . Applied Organometallic Chemistry, 2020, 34(9): e5777. DOI:10.1002/aoc.5777.
DONG Y, YANG M, ZHU T, et al. Fast dehydrogenation kinetics of perhydro-N-propylcarbazole over a supported Pd catalyst[J]. ACS Applied Energy Materials, 2018, 1(8): 4285-4292.
EBERLE U, FELDERHOFF M, SCHÜTH F. Chemical and physical solutions for hydrogen storage[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2009, 48(36): 6608-6630. DOI:10.1002/anie.200806293.
GODINHO J, HOEFNAGELS R, BRAZ C G, et al. An economic and greenhouse gas footprint assessment of international maritime transportation of hydrogen using liquid organic hydrogen carriers[J]. Energy, 2023, 278: 127673. DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2023.127673.
RODRIGUE J P. The geography of transport systems[M]. 6th Edition. London: Routledge, 2024.
0
Views
10
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010102001997号