1.中油(新疆)石油工程有限公司,新疆 克拉玛依 834000
2.沈阳工业大学电气工程学院, 辽宁 沈阳 110870
3.东北财经大学数据科学与人工智能学院,辽宁 大连 116025
相海杰(1987—),男,本科,工程师,研究方向为热能与动力和新能源,E-mail:836971381@qq.com;
邢作霞,教授,研究方向为新能源控制与并网技术,E-mail:2148109448@qq.com。
收稿:2026-09-04,
修回:2026-10-09,
纸质出版:2026-10-28
移动端阅览
相海杰, 闫家幸, 黄煜, 等. 固态颗粒储热材料动态放热特性实验研究[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2026, 15(10): 4161-4171.
XIANG Haijie, YAN Jiaxing, HUANG Yu, et al. Experimental study on the dynamic heat release characteristics of solid particle thermal storage materials[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2026, 15(10): 4161-4171.
相海杰, 闫家幸, 黄煜, 等. 固态颗粒储热材料动态放热特性实验研究[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2026, 15(10): 4161-4171. DOI: 10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2026.0773.
XIANG Haijie, YAN Jiaxing, HUANG Yu, et al. Experimental study on the dynamic heat release characteristics of solid particle thermal storage materials[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2026, 15(10): 4161-4171. DOI: 10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2026.0773.
为比较固态颗粒储热材料在非稳态放热过程中的温度响应,选取钢渣、沙漠沙和铝矾土,在电加热-颗粒储热-闭式空气循环实验平台上,分析初始设定温度400~800℃及储热管内径28 mm、45 mm条件下的温度-时间记录。以50℃为统一计算参照,区分降至该温度的特征冷却时间、持续10 min低于指定降温速率的判据时间,以及由目标温度和供热功率要求确定的有效放热终止时间。基于集中参数能量关系计算参照时间因数、对数放热进程和参照等效换热系数,并在三种材料共同覆盖的100 K、200 K温降区间开展综合评价及权重敏感性分析。计算采用常物性和圆柱装填近似,温区边界时刻由线性插值获得;各指标按同组材料极差归一化,并以两两得分交点确定排序临界权重。结果表明,800℃名义工况下,28 mm管中钢渣、沙漠沙和铝矾土降至50℃的时间较45 mm管分别缩短13.75%、12.64%和4.11%。在相同材料和共同温区的比较中,小管径的区间平均降温速率提高15.3%~84.1%,但按内侧面积折算的平均显热释放通量变化为-28.3%~14.5%,不呈统一下降趋势。800℃、45 mm工况下,三种材料降温速率峰值对应的对数进程分别约为0.071、0.083和0.057;不同初始温度的换热响应不存在全历程一致的排序。按持续性权重0.70和0.40分别评价100 K和200 K温降区间,钢渣在所比较工况中均得分最高,但部分工况的首位材料会随权重改变。研究明确了热响应评价与负荷侧供热能力之间的区别,可为给定装置构型下的材料和管径比较提供依据。
This study compares the transient temperature responses of steel slag
desert sand
and bauxite in a thermal storage apparatus comprising electric heating
particle-filled tubes
and closed-loop air circulation. Measured temperature histories were analyzed for nominal initial temperatures of 400—800℃ and tube inner diameters of 28 and 45 mm. A fixed reference temperature of 50℃ was used to distinguish three quantities: the characteristic cooling time to this temperature
the first time at which a prescribed low cooling rate persisted for 10 min
and the useful-discharge endpoint defined by the temperature and heat delivery requirements of the load. Reference-based time factors
logarithmic discharge progress
and equivalent heat transfer coefficients were calculated using a lumped energy relation. Composite scores and weight sensitivity were evaluated over common measured temperature intervals with drops of 100 and 200 K. All comparisons used the same material density and specific heat values within a constant-property approximation. Packed masses were estimated from the cylindrical filling volume
and the reference heat transfer area was the inner lateral tube surface. The calculation intervals were selected from the measured temperature ranges shared by all three materials
without extrapolating the data to nominal starting temperatures that were not reached. Linear interpolation determined the times at which the interval boundaries were crossed. Each indicator was normalized by the range across the three materials within the same condition. Pairwise score intersections then identified the weights at which the material ordering changed. At a nominal initial temperature of 800℃
reducing the tube diameter from 45 to 28 mm shortened the cooling time to 50℃ by 13.75% for steel slag
12.64% for desert sand
and 4.11% for bauxite. Across the paired comparisons over common temperature intervals
the smaller tubes increased the interval-average cooling rate by 15.3%—84.1%. However
the corresponding sensible heat release flux based on the inner lateral tube area changed by -28.3% to 14.5%
showing no universal decrease. For the 45 mm tubes at nominal 800℃
the cooling-rate peaks of steel slag
desert sand
and bauxite occurred at logarithmic progress values of approximately 0.071
0.083
and 0.057
respectively. Different initial temperatures did not produce a consistent ordering of the equivalent heat transfer response throughout discharge. Steel slag received the highest composite score in all selected comparisons when the persistence weights were 0.70 for the 100 K intervals and 0.40 for the 200 K intervals. Nevertheless
the leading material changed with the evaluation weight in some conditions. The rate threshold and calculation interval also affected the low-rate criterion time. These results describe temperature-based response indicators under explicitly stated reference and geometric assumptions. They distinguish such indicators from useful heat delivery to a load and provide a reproducible basis for comparing materials and tube configurations within the tested apparatus.
高明娟, 宋国良, 宋维健, 等. 高温烟气加热固体颗粒储热技术研究进展[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2026, 15(3): 1054-1072.
GAO M J, SONG G L, SONG W J, et al. Research progress on high-temperature flue gas heating in solid particle thermal energy storage technology[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2026, 15(3): 1054-1072.
GEORGOUSIS N, DIRIKEN J, SPEETJENS M, et al. Comprehensive review on packed-bed sensible heat storage systems[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2025, 121: 116516. DOI:10.1016/j.est.2025.116516.
李宝让, 马慧博, 赵旭章, 等. 钢渣固废蓄热技术及其潜在的应用技术研究[J]. 材料导报, 2023, 37(14): 184-201.
LI B R, MA H B, ZHAO X Z, et al. Investigations on solid waste steel slag and its potential applied technology in heat storage: A review[J]. Materials Reports, 2023, 37(14): 184-201.
孙丽伟, 宋国良, 纪阳, 等. 固体颗粒储热特性及热稳定性实验研究[J]. 热能动力工程, 2024, 39(8): 112-119.
SUN L W, SONG G L, JI Y, et al. Experimental study on thermal storage characteristics and thermal stability of solid particles[J]. Journal of Engineering for Thermal Energy and Power, 2024, 39(8): 112-119.
LAI Z Y, DING L W, LYU H K, et al. Experimental study on energy storage characteristics of sintered ore particle packed beds[J]. Journal of Thermal Science, 2025, 34(1): 242-253. DOI:10.1007/s11630-024-2079-9.
张岩岩, 熊亚选, 陈亚辉, 等. 相变填充床储热系统研究与应用进展[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2023, 12(12): 3852-3872.
ZHANG Y Y, XIONG Y X, CHEN Y H, et al. Recent progress in the investigation and application of packed-bed latent thermal energy storage systems[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2023, 12(12): 3852-3872.
赵港归, 周月桂. 高温固体颗粒填充床储热特性数值研究[J]. 热能动力工程, 2024, 39(6): 131-138.
ZHAO G G, ZHOU Y G. Numerical study on heat storage characteristics of high temperature solid particle packed bed[J]. Journal of Engineering for Thermal Energy and Power, 2024, 39(6): 131-138.
TREVISAN S, WANG W J, GUEDEZ R, et al. Experimental evaluation of an innovative radial-flow high-temperature packed bed thermal energy storage[J]. Applied Energy, 2022, 311: 118672. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118672.
MUHAMMAD Y, SAINI P, KNOBLOCH K, et al. Rock bed thermal energy storage coupled with solar thermal collectors in an industrial application: Simulation, experimental and parametric analysis[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2023, 67: 107349. DOI:10.1016/j.est.2023.107349.
陈久林, 薛晓迪, 王丽, 等. 基于中高温烟气余热回收的固体显热储热装置热性能实验研究[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2025, 14(8): 3185-3193.
CHEN J L, XUE X D, WANG L, et al. Experimental investigation of thermal performance in a solid sensible heat storage device for medium-high-temperature flue gas waste heat recovery[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2025, 14(8): 3185-3193.
张超, 邢作霞, 付启桐, 等. 固体电热储能装置热工与储能性能测试平台设计[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2023, 12(2): 585-592.
ZHANG C, XING Z X, FU Q T, et al. Design of thermal and energy storage performance test platform for solid electrothermal energy storage device[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2023, 12(2): 585-592.
杜保存, 黄丽娟, 雷勇刚, 等. 填充床熔盐蓄热器的动态温度与应力特性[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2022, 11(7): 2141-2150.
DU B C, HUANG L J, LEI Y G, et al. Dynamic study on the thermal and stress performances of the molten salt packed-bed thermal storage tank[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2022, 11(7): 2141-2150.
张鑫, 邢作霞, 付启桐, 等. 采用感应加热的固体电热储能装置多物理场[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2023, 12(12): 3761-3769.
ZHANG X, XING Z X, FU Q T, et al. Multiphysics study of induction heating for solid electric heat storage devices[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2023, 12(12): 3761-3769.
NETZSCH. DSC 404 F3 Pegasus[EB/OL]. [2026-09-18]. https://analyzing-testing.netzsch.com/en/footer/legacy-products/dsc-404-f3-pegasus.
NETZSCH. LFA 457 MicroFlash[EB/OL]. [2026-09-18]. https://analyzing-testing.netzsch.com/en-US/footer/legacy-products/lfa-457-micro-flash.
BERGMAN T L, LAVINE A S, INCROPERA F P, et al. Introduction to heat transfer[M]. 6th ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2011.
ORTEGA-FERNÁNDEZ I, URIZ I, ORTUONDO A, et al. Operation strategies guideline for packed bed thermal energy storage systems[J]. International Journal of Energy Research, 2019, 43(12): 6211-6221. DOI:10.1002/er.4291.
0
浏览量
13
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010102001997号