西安交通大学热流科学与工程教育部重点实验室,陕西 西安 710049
李智超(1999—),男,博士研究生在读,主要从事锂离子电池快充与状态估计研究,E-mail:leezc@stu.xjtu.edu.cn;
屈治国,教授,主要从事电化学储能与氢能利用等研究,E-mail:zgqu@mail.xjtu.edu.cn。
收稿:2026-07-20,
修回:2026-08-31,
网络首发:2026-09-03,
移动端阅览
李智超, 屈治国. 基于改进迟滞模型与可观测性自适应迭代CKF的储能电池SOC估计研究[J]. 储能科学与技术, XXXX, XX(XX): 1-12.
LI Zhichao, QU Zhiguo. State-of-charge estimation of energy storage batteries based on improved hysteresis model and observability-adaptive iterative cubature Kalman filter[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, XXXX, XX(XX): 1-12.
李智超, 屈治国. 基于改进迟滞模型与可观测性自适应迭代CKF的储能电池SOC估计研究[J]. 储能科学与技术, XXXX, XX(XX): 1-12. DOI: 10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2026.0632.
LI Zhichao, QU Zhiguo. State-of-charge estimation of energy storage batteries based on improved hysteresis model and observability-adaptive iterative cubature Kalman filter[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, XXXX, XX(XX): 1-12. DOI: 10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2026.0632.
针对储能电池迟滞效应和电压平台导致荷电状态(SOC)估计精度下降的问题,提出了一种基于改进Prandtl-Ishlinskii(PI)迟滞模型与可观测性自适应迭代容积卡尔曼滤波(OA-ICKF)的SOC估计方法。在模型方面,采用二次修正函数改进PI模型以描述开路电压的非对称迟滞特性。在算法方面,基于开路电压-SOC灵敏度和电压曲线斜率连续调整滤波器的SOC校正策略。同时引入迭代量测更新控制迭代收敛,提高了强非线性条件下的SOC估计精度。采用RegD动态工况数据和储能电站实际运行数据对所提出的方法进行验证。RegD工况下SOC估计的绝对误差维持在2%以内。在模型初始SOC与实际值存在40%的偏差情况下,最大绝对误差仅为2.06%。储能电站0.5 C和0.25 C充电工况下SOC估计的均方根误差分别为0.718%和0.594%。在连续两次充放电的运行工况下,SOC估计的平均绝对误差和均方根误差分别为1.79%和2.10%。消融实验结果显示,去除改进PI模型、OA机制与迭代量测更新中的一个或多个组件后,SOC估计精度显著下降,表明上述改进模块对SOC估计精度的提升均不可替代。所提出的方法能够准确估计储能电池的SOC,为保证储能电站安全高效运行提供支撑。
To address the degradation of state of charge (SOC) estimation accuracy caused by the hysteresis effect and voltage plateau of energy storage batteries
a SOC estimation method based on an improved Prandtl-Ishlinskii (PI) hysteresis model and an observability-adaptive iterative cubature Kalman filter (OA-ICKF) is proposed. On the modeling side
a quadratic correction function is adopted to improve the PI model for characterizing the asymmetric hysteresis of the open circuit voltage. On the algorithm side
the SOC correction strategy of the filter is continuously adjusted based on the open circuit voltage-SOC sensitivity index and the open-circuit voltage curve slope. Iterative measurement updates are introduced simultaneously to control the convergence to improve the SOC estimation accuracy under strongly nonlinear conditions. The proposed method was validated using RegD dynamic test data and actual operation data from an energy storage station. Under the RegD condition
the absolute error in SOC estimation remains within 2%. Even when the model's initial SOC deviates by 40% from the actual value
the maximum absolute error is only 2.06%. Under 0.5C and 0.25C charging conditions with energy storage station data
the root mean square errors of SOC estimation are 0.718% and 0.594%. Under the practical operating condition of two consecutive charge-discharge cycles
the mean absolute error and root mean square error of SOC estimation are 1.79% and 2.10%
respectively. Ablation experiments show that removing one or more components of the improved PI model
the OA mechanism
or the iterative measurement update significantly reduces the accuracy of SOC estimation
indicating that all of the aforementioned improved modules are indispensable for enhancing the SOC estimation accuracy. The proposed method accurately estimates the SOC of energy storage batteries
providing support for the safe and efficient operation of energy storage stations.
陈伟, 杨文春. 锂离子电池储能电站智能监测技术与运行保障[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2026, 15(6): 2316-2318.
CHEN W, YANG W C. Operational status monitoring and evaluation of lithium-ion battery energy storage stations[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2026, 15(6): 2316-2318.
ZHANG Z H, WANG H W, LU L G, et al. State-of-charge and capacity estimation for MWh-scale LiFePO 4 peak-shaving battery energy storage stations based on real-world operating data[J ] . Energy, 2025, 339: 139086.
KOOHI-FAYEGH S, ROSEN M A. A review of energy storage types, applications and recent developments[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2020, 27: 101047.
张可信, 胡凯, 芦勃睿, 等. 电化学储能系统中磷酸铁锂电池荷电状态估计研究[J]. 自动化应用, 2024, 65(11): 147-149.
ZHANG K X, HU K, LU B R, et al. Research on state of charge estimation of lithium iron phosphate batteries in electrochemical energy storage systems[J]. Automation Application, 2024, 65(11): 147-149.
赵志斌, 袁鸿明, 刘炳辰, 等. eVTOL飞行器电池SOC估计: 内嵌等效电路模型的神经网络[J]. 推进技术, 2026, 47(6): 107-117.
ZHAO Z B, YUAN H M, LIU B C, et al. Battery SOC estimation for eVTOL aircraft: neural network with embedded equivalent circuit model[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2026, 47(6): 107-117.
BAO G Y, LIU X H, ZOU B S, et al. Collaborative framework of Transformer and LSTM for enhanced state-of-charge estimation in lithium-ion batteries[J]. Energy, 2025, 322: 135548.
ZHOU Y H, WANG C D, GU T C, et al. State of charge estimation of lithium-ion batteries using transfer dual-stream physics-informed network[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2026, 141: 119451.
XUE J W, DU X Z, ZHAO L, et al. Active-learning-driven error control for data-driven state of charge estimation across the lithium battery lifecycle[J]. Energy and AI, 2025, 21: 100549.
OH S, KIM J, MOON I. Hybrid data-driven deep learning model for state of charge estimation of Li-ion battery in an electric vehicle[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2024, 97: 112887.
李清波, 张懋慧, 罗英, 等. 基于等效电路模型融合电化学原理的锂离子电池荷电状态估计[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(9): 3072-3083.
LI Q B, ZHANG M H, LUO Y, et al. Lithium-ion battery state of charge estimation based on equivalent circuit model[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2024, 13(9): 3072-3083.
JIANG Z R, ZHANG Y F, GAO R J. An improved electrochemical-thermal coupling model for state-of-charge estimation of lithium-ion battery[J]. Energy, 2025, 333: 137486.
WANG J R, MENG J H, PENG Q, et al. An electrochemical-thermal coupling model for lithium-ion battery state-of-charge estimation with improve dual particle filter framework[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2024, 87: 111473.
DONG G Z, GAO G X, LOU Y J, et al. Hybrid physics and data-driven electrochemical states estimation for lithium-ion batteries[J]. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 2024, 39(4): 2689-2700.
NI Z C, JIA C. A comparative study of battery state of charge estimation with equivalent circuit model and empirical model[J]. Measurement, 2026, 258: 119162.
LI J Y, SHE C Q, BIN G F, et al. Comparative study of battery SoC estimation strategies based on fusion of equivalent circuit models and filter method in real-world scenarios[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2026, 157: 121683.
ZHAO X, DE CALLAFON R A. Modeling of battery dynamics and hysteresis for power delivery prediction and SOC estimation[J]. Applied Energy, 2016, 180: 823-833.
ZHOU W L, MA X Y, WANG H, et al. SOC estimation based on hysteresis characteristics of lithium iron phosphate battery[J]. Machines, 2022, 10(8): 658.
YAN L S, PENG J, ZHU Z Y, et al. Data-driven modeling of open circuit voltage hysteresis for LiFePO 4 batteries with conditional generative adversarial network[J ] . Energy and AI, 2025, 20: 100478.
ZHANG H P, HU B, YU Z L, et al. State-of-charge estimation of lithium-ion battery based on improved equivalent circuit model considering hysteresis combined with adaptive iterative unscented Kalman filtering[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2024, 102: 114105.
JI S Y, SUN Y, CHEN Z X, et al. A multi-scale time method for the state of charge and parameter estimation of lithium-ion batteries using MIUKF-EKF[J]. Frontiers in Energy Research, 2022, 10: 933240.
HE Z G, ZHANG X G, FU X R, et al. Research on battery state of charge estimation based on variable window adaptive extended Kalman filter[J]. International Journal of Electrochemical Science, 2024, 19: 100440.
PENG S M, ZHANG A, LIU D D, et al. State-of-charge estimation of lithium-ion batteries based on dual-coefficient tracking improved square-root unscented Kalman filter[J]. Batteries, 2023, 9(8): 392.
廉高棨, 叶敏, 王桥, 等. 基于改进模型与优化自适应CKF的锂离子电池快速变温工况下的SOC估计[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(5): 1667-1676.
LIAN G Q, YE M, WANG Q, et al. State-of-charge estimation of lithium-ion batteries in rapid temperature-varying environments based on improved battery model and optimized adaptive cubature Kalman filter[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2024, 13(5): 1667-1676.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010102001997号