1.中国电建集团北京勘测设计研究院有限公司,北京 102206
2.华北电力大学能源动力与机械工程学院,北京 102206
徐珊珊(1982—),女,硕士研究生,正高级工程师,研究方向为电氢耦合,xuss@bjy.powerchina.cn;
徐超,教授,研究方向为电解水制氢、太阳能热利用等,mechxu@ncepu.edu.cn。
收稿:2026-07-03,
修回:2026-09-04,
网络首发:2026-09-15,
移动端阅览
徐珊珊, 朱国金, 齐志诚, 等. 光伏发电-质子交换膜电解水耦合制氢系统动态性能研究[J]. 储能科学与技术, XXXX, XX(XX): 1-13.
XU Shanshan, ZHU Guojin, QI Zhicheng, et al. Dynamic Performance Study of a Photovoltaic Power Generation~Proton Exchange Membrane Water Electrolysis Coupled Hydrogen Production System[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, XXXX, XX(XX): 1-13.
徐珊珊, 朱国金, 齐志诚, 等. 光伏发电-质子交换膜电解水耦合制氢系统动态性能研究[J]. 储能科学与技术, XXXX, XX(XX): 1-13. DOI: 10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2026.0577.
XU Shanshan, ZHU Guojin, QI Zhicheng, et al. Dynamic Performance Study of a Photovoltaic Power Generation~Proton Exchange Membrane Water Electrolysis Coupled Hydrogen Production System[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, XXXX, XX(XX): 1-13. DOI: 10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2026.0577.
在“双碳”目标和可再生能源消纳需求推动下,光伏(PV)直接耦合质子交换膜电解水(PEMWE)制氢是绿氢生产与长周期储能的重要技术路径。针对光伏输出波动导致的功率匹配不足和PEMWE电-热动态响应问题,本文基于光伏工程模型和已验证的PEMWE电-热耦合模型,构建了PV-PEMWE耦合系统和含Boost变换器及电导增量法MPPT控制的间接耦合系统,比较了辐照阶跃、进水流量和进水温度对系统动态性能的影响,并从能量传输效率、电压、温度、制氢效率、系统效率和产氢速率等方面对两种耦合方式进行了对比分析。结果表明,间接耦合系统能够更充分捕获光伏最大功率,使能量传输效率较直接耦合提高约1.5%~5%,产氢速率提高约6%;在辐照波动工况下,间接耦合能够改善光伏与PEMWE之间的动态功率匹配,减弱光伏输出扰动对电解槽运行状态的直接影响,表现出更好的运行稳定性。进水流量增大可增强散热能力,降低温升、电压超调和热平衡时间;进水温度升高有助于改善电解反应动力学,提高制氢效率和系统效率。研究结果表明,间接耦合模式在复杂气象波动条件下具有更优的功率匹配能力和动态稳定性,可为光伏制氢系统架构选择、参数优化和稳定运行提供参考。
Driven by the "dual carbon" goals and the demand for renewable energy consumption
the direct coupling of photovoltaic (PV) power generation with proton exchange membrane water electrolysis (PEMWE) for hydrogen production represents an important technical pathway for green hydrogen production and long-duration energy storage. To address the insufficient power matching caused by fluctuations in PV output and the electro-thermal dynamic response of PEMWE
this study establishes a PV-PEMWE coupled system and an indirect coupling system incorporating a Boost converter and incremental conductance maximum power point tracking (MPPT) control
based on a PV engineering model and a validated PEMWE electro-thermal coupling model. The effects of irradiance step changes
inlet water flow rate
and inlet water temperature on the dynamic performance of the system are compared. The two coupling modes are further compared in terms of energy transfer efficiency
voltage
temperature
hydrogen production efficiency
system efficiency
and hydrogen production rate. The results show that the indirect coupling system can more fully capture the maximum PV power
increasing energy transfer efficiency by approximately 1.5%~5% and improving the hydrogen production rate by about 6% compared with the direct coupling system. Under fluctuating irradiance conditions
the indirect coupling system improves the dynamic power matching between the PV array and PEMWE
mitigates the direct impact of PV output fluctuations on electrolyzer operation
and thereby exhibits better operational stability. Increasing the inlet water flow rate enhances heat dissipation capacity
reduces temperature rise
voltage overshoot
and the time required to reach thermal equilibrium. Increasing the inlet water temperature helps improve electrolysis reaction kinetics and enhances both hydrogen production efficiency and overall system efficiency. The results indicate that the indirect coupling mode exhibits superior power matching capability and dynamic stability under complex meteorological fluctuation conditions
providing a reference for system architecture selection
parameter optimization
and stable operation of photovoltaic hydrogen production systems.
KAMRAN M, TURZYŃSKI M. Exploring hydrogen energy systems: A comprehensive review of technologies, applications, prevailing trends, and associated challenges[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2024, 96: 112601.
RAKOUSKY C, REIMER U, WIPPERMANN K, et al. Polymer electrolyte membrane water electrolysis: Restraining degradation in the presence of fluctuating power[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2017, 342: 38-47.
WANG T, CAO X, JIAO L. PEM water electrolysis for hydrogen production: Fundamentals, advances, and prospects[J]. Carbon Neutrality, 2022, 1(1): 21.
HE M, NIE G, YANG H, et al. A generic equivalent circuit model for PEM electrolyzer with multi-timescale and stages under multi-mode control[J]. Applied Energy, 2024, 359: 122728.
KHAN M A, NIELSEN M R, GOLSORKHI M S, et al. Multiphysics modeling of electrolyzers under dynamic converter operation[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2025, 176: 151478.
ENGEL F K, WODAK S, ZANDER H J, et al. Dynamic multi-physics 1D-model of a proton exchange membrane electrolysis cell[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2025, 119: 56-72.
ASIABAN S, BOZALAKOV D, VANDEVELDE L. Development of a dynamic mathematical model of PEM electrolyser for integration into large-scale power systems[J]. Energy Conversion and Management: X, 2024, 23: 100610.
ESPINOSA-LÓPEZ M, DARRAS C, POGGI P, et al. Modelling and experimental validation of a 46 kW PEM high pressure water electrolyzer[J]. Renewable Energy, 2018, 119: 160-173.
廖志凌, 阮新波. 任意光强和温度下的硅太阳电池非线性工程简化数学模型[J]. 太阳能学报, 2009, 30(4): 430-435.
LIAO Zhiling, RUAN Xinbo. Non-linear engineering simplification model of silicon solar cells in arbitrary solar radiation and temperature[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2009, 30(4): 430-435.
SKOPLAKI E, PALYVOS J A. On the temperature dependence of photovoltaic module electrical performance: A review of efficiency/power correlations[J]. Solar Energy, 2009, 83(5): 614-624.
GALLARDO F, GARCÍA J, MONFORTI FERRARIO A, et al. Assessing sizing optimality of OFF-GRID AC-linked solar PV-PEM systems for hydrogen production[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(64): 27303-27325.
DING L, PENG X, HOU J, et al. Hydrogen Production by Proton Exchange Membrane Water Electrolysis in the Presence of Wind-Solar Fluctuating Power Supply: Development and Application[J]. Strategic Study of CAE, 2023, 25(6): 237-247.
ZHENG N, DING X, ZHOU Y, et al. Dynamic modeling and response characteristics of a solar-driven polygeneration system coupled with hydrogen and thermal energy storage[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2023, 293: 117496.
MAKHSOOS A, KANDIDAYENI M, AIT ZIANE M, et al. Energy management for modular proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers under fluctuating solar inputs: A constrained nonlinear optimization approach[J]. Applied Energy, 2025, 394: 126124.
HÜNER B. Mathematical modeling of an integrated photovoltaic-assisted PEM water electrolyzer system for hydrogen production[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 79: 594-608.
LI X, ZHANG Q, XIAO F, et al. Dynamic modeling and analysis of electro-thermal coupling characteristics in proton exchange membrane water electrolysis[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2025, 175: 150955.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010102001997号