1.河海大学水利水电学院,江苏 南京 210024
2.上海勘测设计研究院有限公司,上海 200434
王子君(2002—),女,硕士研究生,研究方向为压缩空气储能地下结构,E-mail:241602010101@hhu.edu.cn;
沈雷,副教授,研究方向为抽水蓄能和压气储能地下洞室结构安全分析,E-mail:shenl@hhu.edu.cn。
收稿:2026-05-18,
修回:2026-06-19,
网络首发:2026-07-18,
移动端阅览
王子君, 闫志远, 闻锐, 等. 层间热失配与滑移引起的浅埋压气储能内衬洞室承载特性与设计建议[J]. 储能科学与技术, XXXX, XX(XX): 1-12.
WANG Zijun, YAN Zhiyuan, WEN Rui, et al. Load characteristics and design recommendations for lined rock caverns in shallow-buried compressed air energy storage considering thermal strain mismatch and interlayer slip[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, XXXX, XX(XX): 1-12.
王子君, 闫志远, 闻锐, 等. 层间热失配与滑移引起的浅埋压气储能内衬洞室承载特性与设计建议[J]. 储能科学与技术, XXXX, XX(XX): 1-12. DOI: 10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2026.0433.
WANG Zijun, YAN Zhiyuan, WEN Rui, et al. Load characteristics and design recommendations for lined rock caverns in shallow-buried compressed air energy storage considering thermal strain mismatch and interlayer slip[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, XXXX, XX(XX): 1-12. DOI: 10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2026.0433.
压缩空气储能电站的浅埋储气洞室承受高内压(大于地应力)和大温差等循环荷载作用,其“钢板密封层-混凝土衬砌-围岩”复合内衬的承载特性是结构设计的重要依据。本文针对内蒙古在建148 m埋深的储气洞室,采用热弹塑性损伤和热接触模型分析充放气循环过程中复合内衬的承载变化规律,研究发现:在高温高压的充气储能工况下,钢材热膨胀性能大于混凝土与岩石,导致复合内衬层间产生温度应变(热)失配现象,当考虑层间摩擦接触滑移效应时,混凝土衬砌因与钢板密封层之间发生滑移导致裂缝宽度增加,而对应钢板密封层应力下降(87.4 MPa);在低温低压的放气发电工况下,此时复合内衬总体变形较小,但钢板密封层产生最大的冷缩应变,其弹性应变增加,进而产生循环周期最大弹性应力(272.6 MPa),以满足衬砌整体变形协调,说明该工况才是钢板密封层设计依据;上述运行工况分析揭示了浅埋储气洞室荷载在围岩-混凝土衬砌-钢板密封层之间的循环转移机制,说明浅埋储气洞室在设计计算时需要考虑热失配和层间滑移的作用。
Shallow-buried air storage caverns in compressed air energy storage (CAES) power stations are subjected to cyclic loadings of high internal pressure (exceeding in-situ stress) and significant cyclic temperature variations. The load-bearing behavior of the "steel sealing layer-concrete-rock" composite lining serves as a critical basis for structural design. Focusing on an under-construction underground CAES cavern at a buried depth of 148m in Inner Mongolia
this study analyzes the evolution of the load-bearing capacity of the composite lining during charge-discharge cycles considering the thermo-elastoplastic damage and thermal contact behavior. It is found that
during high temperature and pressure charging stage
thermal strain mismatch occurs between steel sealing layer-concrete-rock caused by different thermal expansion coefficients. When considering interlayer frictional slip effects
the crack widths in the concrete lining increases due to the relative slip between the concrete lining and the steel sealing layer. Correspondingly
the stress of steel sealing layer decrease to 87.4 MPa. During the low temperature and pressure discharging stage
the steel sealing layer presents a maximum elastic strain and thus generates the maximum stress (272.6 MPa)
although the overall lining deformation is relatively small. These results demonstrate that the discharging stage constitutes the critical basis for steel sealing layer structure design. In summary
the thermo-mechanical analysis of aforementioned the operating conditions reveals a cyclic load transfer mechanism among the surrounding rock-concrete lining-steel sealing layer. These results underline the necessity of accounting for thermal mismatch and interlayer slip in the structural design calculations for shallow-buried air storage caverns.
陈海生, 李泓, 徐玉杰, 等. 2024年中国储能技术研究进展 [J]. 储能科学与技术, 2025, 14(06): 2149-92.
CHEN H, LI H, XU Y, et al. Research progress on China's energy storage technology in 2024 [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2025, 14(6): 2149-2192.
BUDT M, WOLF D, SPAN R, et al. A review on compressed air energy storage: Basic principles, past milestones and recent developments [J]. Applied Energy, 2016, 170: 250-68.
蒋中明, 唐栋, 李鹏, 等. 压气储能地下储气库选型选址研究 [J]. 南方能源建设, 2019, 6(03): 6-16.
JIANG Z, TANG D, LI P, et al. Research on Selection Method for the Types and Sites of Underground Repository for Compressed Air Storage [J]. Southern Energy Construction, 2019, 6(03): 6-16.
XU C, XIA C, ZHANG G, et al. Residual rock deformation of lined caverns for underground energy storage after air deflation considering stress path [J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2025, 17(7): 4160-78.
王者超, 李嘉祥, 郝薛将, 等. 压气储能地下内衬洞室建设中若干关键问题研究进展 [J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2024, 6(01): 1-13.
WANG Z, LI J, HAO X, et al. A review of several issues for compressed gas energy storage in lined rock cavern [J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2024, 6(01): 1-13.
夏才初, 赵海斌, 梅松华, 等. 埋深对压气储能内衬洞室稳定性影响的定量分析 [J]. 绍兴文理学院学报(自然科学), 2016, 36(09): 1-7.
XIA C, ZHAO H, MEI S, et al. Quantitative Analysis of Impact of Cover Depth on Stability of a Lined Rock Cavern for Compressed Air Energy Storage [J]. Journal of Shaoxing University, 2016, 36(09): 1-7.
LI P, KANG H, ZHU Q, et al. Numerical and experimental investigations of concrete lined compressed air energy st orage system [J ] . Journal of Cleaner Production, 2023, 390 .
XU Y, XIA C, XU C, et al. An innovative large-scale physical model test system for underground lined rock caverns of compressed air energy storage [J ] . Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2026, 168 .
ZHOU S, XIA C, ZHAO H, et al. Statistical damage constitutive model for rocks subjected to cyclic stress and cyclic temperature [J]. Acta Geophysica, 2017, 65(5): 893-906.
XU Y, XIA C, ZHOU S, et al. An analytical solution for elastoplastic responses of a lined rock cavern for compressed air energy storage considering excavation and high internal pressure [J ] . Computers and Geotechnics, 2024, 170 .
LI Z L, WANG H Z, HAN Y, et al. Elastoplastic theoretical analysis of load-bearing mechanism of lined rock cavern for compressed air energy storage power station [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2026, 30(1): 1-29.
张国华, 相月, 王薪锦, 等. 压气储能地下内衬储气库结构荷载分担解析解及影响因素分析 [J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2024, 43(S2): 3633-50.
ZHANG G, XIANG Y, WANG X, et al. Analytical solution for load sharing in the structure of an underground lined rock cavern for compressed air energy storage and analysis of influencing factors [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2024, 43(S2): 3633-50.
JIN S Y, XIA C C, LV Z T, et al. Theoretical analysis of underground artificial caverns layout design for compressed air energy storage based on surrounding rock-lining stability and shakedown [J ] . TUNNELLING AND UNDERGROUND SPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2026, 168 .
SCHMIDT F, MENéNDEZ J, KONIETZKY H, et al. Converting closed mines into giant batteries: effects of cyclic loading on the geomechanical performance of underground compressed air energy storage systems [J ] . Journal of Energy Storage, 2020, 32 .
SCHMIDT F, MENéNDEZ J, KONIETZKY H, et al. Technical feasibility of lined mining tunnels in closed coal mines as underground reservoirs of compressed air energy storage systems [J ] . Journal of Energy Storage, 2024, 78 .
MIAO X, ZHANG K, WANG J, et al. Coupled thermodynamic and thermomechanical modelling for compressed air energy storage in underground mine tunnels [J ] . International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2024, 176 .
孙冠华, 王娇, 于显杨, 等. 压缩空气储能电站地下内衬硐库基本原理与分析方法研究进展 [J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 1-25.
SUN G, WANG J, YU X, et al. Research progress on basic principles and analysis methods of lined rock caverns for compressed air energy storage station [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(1): 1-25.
周舒威, 夏才初, 张平阳, 等. 地下压气储能圆形内衬洞室内压和温度引起应力计算 [J]. 岩土工程学报, 2014, 36(11): 2025-35.
ZHOU Si, XIA C, ZHANG P, et al. Analytical approach for stress induced by internal pressure and temperature of underground compressed air energy storage in a circular lined rock cavern [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(11): 2025-35.
蒋中明, 甘露, 张登祥, 等. 压气储能地下储气库衬砌裂缝分布特征及演化规律研究 [J]. 岩土工程学报, 2024, 46(01): 110-9.
JIANG Z, GAN L, ZHANG D, et al. Distribution characteristics and evolution laws of liner cracks in underground caverns for compressed air energy storage [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46(01): 110-9.
傅丹, 胡小康, 伍鹤皋, 等. 压气储能地下洞室密封钢衬的非线性力学响应特征 [J]. 水力发电, 2024, 50(05): 38-44+92.
FU D, HU X, WU H, et al. Characteristics of Nonlinear Mechanical Response of Sealing Steel Lining in Underground High Pressure Air Storage Caverns [J]. Water Power, 2024, 50(05): 38-44+92.
NGUYEN Q T, SAĞıROĞLU S, LIVAOĞLU R. Effects of concrete-to-concrete surface treatment methods on the bending behavior of RC buildings: A numerical investigation [J ] . Structures, 2025, 80 .
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010102001997号