智库式重力储能布局方案及结构体系研究

陈燕; 陈康泽; 黄慧; 唐敢; 尹凌峰; 陈松钰

doi:10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2026.0383

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

智库式重力储能布局方案及结构体系研究

储能系统与工程 | 更新时间：2026-10-22

- 智库式重力储能布局方案及结构体系研究
- Research on the layout scheme and structure system of think tank type gravity energy storage
- 储能科学与技术 2026年15卷第10期页码：4025-4035
- 作者机构：
  
  1.中国能源建设集团江苏省电力设计院有限公司，江苏南京 211102
  2.南京航空航天大学土木与机场工程系，江苏南京 211106
  3.东南大学土木工程学院，江苏南京 211189
- 作者简介：
  
  陈燕（1974—），女，硕士，高级工程师，研究方向为能源电力系统结构，E-mail：chenyan@jspdi.com.cn；
  唐敢，副教授，研究方向为新型储能系统及结构体系，E-mail：tanggan@sina.com。
- 基金信息：
  
  中国能源建设集团江苏省电力设计院有限公司技术开发项目资助(32-JK-2023-028)
- DOI：10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2026.0383
  中图分类号： TK 02
- 收稿：2026-05-07，
  
  修回：2026-08-03，
  
  纸质出版：2026-10-28
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
陈燕, 陈康泽, 黄慧, 等. 智库式重力储能布局方案及结构体系研究[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2026, 15(10): 4025-4035.

CHEN Yan, CHEN Kangze, HUANG Hui, et al. Research on the layout scheme and structure system of think tank type gravity energy storage[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2026, 15(10): 4025-4035.
陈燕, 陈康泽, 黄慧, 等. 智库式重力储能布局方案及结构体系研究[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2026, 15(10): 4025-4035. DOI： 10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2026.0383.

CHEN Yan, CHEN Kangze, HUANG Hui, et al. Research on the layout scheme and structure system of think tank type gravity energy storage[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2026, 15(10): 4025-4035. DOI： 10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2026.0383.

摘要

在全球能源低碳转型与储能需求日益增长的背景下，智库式重力储能这种新型物理储能技术，不仅对环境友好，而且布局灵活，具有重要的战略意义和应用前景。本研究围绕智库式重力储能结构开展了递进式对比研究，首先提出了穿梭式、区间式、平行式三种布置方案，在发电量约100 MWh相同条件下，从占地面积、用钢量、层间位移角及经济性等维度对比了三种布置方案；然后基于平行式方案，对比混凝土结构、钢结构、型钢混凝土结构及钢管混凝土结构四种主体材料体系；最后针对纯框架侧向刚度不足问题，对比框架-剪力墙与框架-支撑两种抗侧力体系。结果表明，在布局方案对比中，“平行式”方案为最优布局；在材料方案对比中，“型钢混凝土柱+混凝土梁”组合结构为最佳方案；在抗侧力体系方案对比中，“框架-支撑”体系为最适配方案。因此以“平行式”布局为基础、“型钢混凝土柱+混凝土梁”为主体承重体系、“框架-支撑”为抗侧力体系的组合结构方案，在满足储能功能与结构安全的前提下，较好地协调了结构性能、建筑功能与经济性之间的关系，可为工程设计提供参考。

Abstract

Against the background of global low-carbon energy transition and rapidly growing demand for energy storage

stacked gravity energy storage represents an environmentally friendly and flexibly deployable physical energy storage technology with important strategic value and promising engineering prospects. This paper presents a progressive comparative study on the structural design of stacked gravity energy storage systems. Three layout schemes

namely shuttle-type

zonal

and parallel configurations

are proposed and comprehensively compared in terms of land occupation

steel consumption

inter-story drift ratio

and economic performance under a rated capacity of approximately 100 MWh. Based on the optimal parallel layout

four structural material systems

including concrete

steel

steel-reinforced concrete composite

and concrete-filled steel tubular structures

are further evaluated. To improve the insufficient lateral stiffness of conventional frame structures

two lateral force-resisting systems

frame-shear wall and frame-brace systems

are also compared. The results show that the parallel layout achieves the best overall performance among the three layout schemes. The composite system consisting of steel-reinforced concrete columns and concrete beams exhibits superior structural and economic performance among all material schemes. Furthermore

the frame-brace system is the most suitable lateral resistance solution for such structures. The integrated structural scheme adopting parallel layout

steel-reinforced concrete columns and concrete beams as the primary load-bearing system

and frame-brace lateral resistance can effectively balance structural performance

functional requirements and economic efficiency

while satisfying the safety and operational requirements of gravity energy storage projects. The outcomes provide a feasible design reference for future engineering practice.

关键词

Keywords

references

吴琦, 金洋, 韩旭. "双碳"目标下的能源发展路径[J]. 有色冶金节能, 2021(6): 6-9.

WU Q, JIN Y, HAN X. Energy development path under the "2-stage carbon reduction" goal[J]. Energy Saving of Nonferrous Metallurgy, 2021(6): 6-9.

林伯强, 杨梦琦. 碳中和背景下中国电力系统研究现状、挑战与发展方向[J]. 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 42(5): 1-10. DOI:10.15896/j.xjtuskxb.202205001.

LIN B Q, YANG M Q. China's power system research in the context of carbon neutrality: Current status, challenges, and development direction[J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University (Social Sciences), 2022, 42(5): 1-10. DOI:10.15896/j.xjtuskxb. 202205001.

LEE J U. IEA, World Energy Outlook 2020[J]. KEPCO Journal on Electric Power and Energy, 2021, 7(1): 2465-8111. DOI:10.18770/KEPCO.2021.07.01.025.

陈海生, 凌浩恕, 徐玉杰. 能源革命中的物理储能技术[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2019, 34(4): 450-459. DOI:10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045. 2019.04.010.

CHEN H S, LING H S, XU Y J. Physical energy storage technology in energy revolution[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2019, 34(4): 450-459. DOI:10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.2019.04.010.

任建明. "碳中和" 背景下的风电发展[J]. 农村电气化, 2021(7): 60-63. DOI:10.13882/j.cnki.ncdqh.2021.07.019.

REN J M. Wind power development in the context of carbon neutrality[J]. Rural Electrification, 2021(7): 60-63. DOI:10.13882/j.cnki.ncdqh.2021.07.019.

刘英军, 刘畅, 王伟, 等. 储能发展现状与趋势分析[J]. 中外能源, 2017, 22(4): 80-88.

LIU Y J, LIU C, WANG W, et al. Analysis of development status and trend of energy storage technology[J]. Sino-Global Energy, 2017, 22(4): 80-88.

前瞻产业研究院. 2020年中国电力行业发展现状分析[J]. 电器工业, 2020(10): 48-50.

Forward looking Industry Research Institute. Analysis on the development status of China electric power industry in 2020[J]. China Electrical Equipment Industry, 2020(10): 48-50.

彭程, 彭才德, 高洁, 等. 新时代水电发展展望[J]. 水力发电, 2021, 47(8): 1-3, 98. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.0559-9342.2021.08.001.

PENG C, PENG C D, GAO J, et al. Prospects for hydropower development in a new development stage in China[J]. Water Power, 2021, 47(8): 1-3, 98. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.0559-9342.20 21.08.001.

CHATURVEDI D K, YADAV S, SRIVASTAVA T, et al. Electricity storage system: A gravity battery[C ] //2020 Fourth World Conference on Smart Trends in Systems, Security and Sustainability (WorldS4). July 27-28, 2020 , London, UK. IEEE, 2020: 412-416. DOI:10.1109/WorldS450073.2020.9210321.

李苑. 推动储能产业发展多项政策正加紧制定[N]. 上海证券报, 2021-07-12. DOI:10.28719/n.cnki.nshzj.2021.003020.

童家麟, 洪庆, 吕洪坤, 等. 电源侧储能技术发展现状及应用前景综述[J]. 华电技术, 2021, 43(7): 17-23. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-1951.2021.07.003.

TONG J L, HONG Q, LYU H K, et al. Development status and application prospect of power side energy storage technology[J]. Huadian Technology, 2021, 43(7): 17-23. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-1951.2021.07.003.

王珏, 廖溢文, 韩文福, 等. 碳达峰背景下抽水蓄能-风电联合系统建模及有功功率控制特性研究[J]. 水利水电技术(中英文), 2021, 52(9): 172-181.

WANG J, LIAO Y W, HAN W F, et al. Modeling and active power control characteristics of pumped storage-wind hybrid power system in the context of peak carbon dioxide emission[J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 2021, 52(9): 172-181.

王晓涛. 新型储能"十四五"规模骤增核心技术坚持自主可控[N]. 中国经济导报, 2021-08-03(005). DOI:10.28095/n.cnki.ncjjd.2021.001854.

吴智泉, 贾纯超, 陈磊, 等. 新型电力系统中储能创新方向研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2021, 42(10): 444-451. DOI:10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2021-0762.

WU Z Q, JIA C C, CHEN L, et al. Research on innovative direction of energy storage in new power system construction[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2021, 42(10): 444-451. DOI:10. 19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2021-0762.

邓恢平. 新能源+储能是未来储能主要应用领域[N]. 中国电力报, 2021-07-15(005). DOI:10.28061/n.cnki.ncdlb.2021.001313.

BOTTENFIELD G, HATIPOGLU K, PANTA Y. Advanced rail energy and storag e: Analysis of potential implementations for the state of west Virginia[C ] //2018 North American Power Symposium (NAPS). September 9-11, 2018 , Fargo, ND, USA. IEEE, 2019: 1-4. DOI:10.1109/NAPS.2018.8600665.

RUOSO A C, CAETANO N R, ROCHA L A O. Storage gravitational energy for small scale industrial and residential applications[J]. Inventions, 2019, 4(4): 64. DOI:10.3390/inventions4040064.

罗振军, 黄田, 梅江平, 等. 依托山体的重力储能系统: CN103867408A[P]. 2014-06-18.

谭国俊, 冯维, 杨波, 等. 高效重力储能装置: CN106704121A[P]. 2017-05-24.

肖立业, 史黎明, 韦统振, 等. 铁路轨道运载车辆储能系统: CN108437808A[P]. 2018-08-24.

张正秋, 武安, 张海川. 一种依托煤矿矿井的重力储能系统: CN209676010U[P]. 2019-11-22.

贾海梁, 王宁宁, 吴云, 等. 大型露天矿坑综合储能路径及关键技术问题[J]. 安全与环境工程, 2026, 33(2): 21-40.

JIA H L, WANG N N, WU Y, et al. Comprehensive energy storage paths and related key technical problems at large open-pit mines[J]. Safety and Environmental Engineering, 2026, 33(2): 21-40.

杨鹏, 王军伟, 陈亚军, 等. 油田废弃井筒重力储能技术分析及构想[J]. 设备管理与维修, 2026(1): 5-7. DOI:10.16621/j.cnki.issn1001-0599.2026.01.02.

YANG P, WANG J W, CHEN Y J, et al. Analysis and conception of gravity energy storage technology for abandoned wellbore in oilfield[J]. Plant Maintenance Engineering, 2026(1): 5-7. DOI:10.16621/j.cnki.issn1001-0599.2026.01.02.

邱清泉, 肖立业, 罗晓悦, 等. 重力储能技术的研究进展[J]. 电工电能新技术, 2025, 44(10): 50-61.

QIU Q Q, XIAO L Y, LUO X Y, et al. Research progress of gravity energy storage technology[J]. Advanced Technology of Electrical Engineering and Energy, 2025, 44(10): 50-61.

罗晓悦, 邱清泉, 靖立伟, 等. 垂直式重力储能系统能效研究[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2026, 15(6): 2341-2354.

LUO X Y, QIU Q Q, JING L W, et al. Energy efficiency analysis of vertical gravity energy storage systems[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2026, 15(6): 2341-2354.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

垂直循环式直线电机重力储能系统设计与功率特性分析

基于扇形码放区的重力储能系统低能耗质量块码放方法

重力储能技术研究进展及展望

基于改进的NSGA-II重力储能重物块分级优化策略

百MWh级竖井式重力储能系统重物块储存与运输方案