东南大学能源与环境学院,江苏 南京 210000
崔梦颖(1999—),女,博士研究生,研究方向为跨季节地埋管储热技术,E-mail:myc759@163.com;
殷勇高,教授,主要从事储热储冷技术、高温热泵与低碳供暖等研究,E-mail:y.yin@seu.edu.cn。
收稿:2026-01-31,
修回:2026-02-06,
纸质出版:2026-03-28
移动端阅览
崔梦颖, 殷勇高, 赵栋霖, 等. 地埋管跨季节储热耦合热泵供暖系统性能与经济性分析[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2026, 15(3): 983-992.
CUI Mengying, YIN Yonggao, ZHAO Donglin, et al. Performance and economic analysis of borehole thermal energy storage integrated heat pump heating system[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2026, 15(3): 983-992.
崔梦颖, 殷勇高, 赵栋霖, 等. 地埋管跨季节储热耦合热泵供暖系统性能与经济性分析[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2026, 15(3): 983-992. DOI: 10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2026.0107.
CUI Mengying, YIN Yonggao, ZHAO Donglin, et al. Performance and economic analysis of borehole thermal energy storage integrated heat pump heating system[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2026, 15(3): 983-992. DOI: 10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2026.0107.
跨季节地埋管储热供热系统可通过低品位热的跨季节转移与热泵提质利用,实现高效、低成本的低碳供热,但现有研究对不同规模井群长周期运行特性研究有限。通过TRNSYS建立了跨季节地埋管储热耦合热泵供热系统模型,并开展了10年连续运行模拟。系统分析了不同热源温度(30~50℃)和不同钻孔数量(200~2000)对储热体储热容量、热损失、供热系统性能和经济性的影响。结果表明:将钻孔数量从200个增加到2000个可显著降低单位体积热损失,以第10年为例,热源温度为50℃的系统储热效率由75.0%提升至85.0%,热损失率由20.0%降至11.9%。另外,增大钻孔数量会改变单位体积热损失在侧面、顶部与底部之间的占比,储热体侧面热损失占比下降,顶部和底部热损失占比增加。大规模储热体有必要采取地表保温措施减少顶部热损失。热源温度与规模共同决定储热效率与系统季节性能系数。降低热源温度可以提高储热效率,但会增加热泵供热能耗,在低电价地区和热源回收成本较高时更具经济优势。本研究可为低品位热源条件下跨季节地埋管储热系统规模选取和系统热损失优化提供参考。
Borehole thermal energy storage heating systems can deliver efficient
low-cost
low-carbon heating by seasonally storing low-grade heat and upgrading it via heat pumps. However
research on the long-term operating characteristics of borehole fields across different scales remains insufficient. In this study
a borehole thermal energy storage integrated heat pump system was developed in TRNSYS and simulated for 10 consecutive years. The effects of heat-source temperature (30—50℃) and borehole number (200—2000) on storage capacity
heat loss
heating system performance
and economics were evaluated. The results show that increasing the number of boreholes from 200 to 2000 significantly reduces volumetric heat loss. Taking Year 10 as an example
for the 50℃ heat-source case
the storage efficiency increases from 75.0% to 85.0%
while the heat-loss ratio decreases from 20.0% to 11.9%. In addition
as the borehole number increases
the distribution of heat loss shifts among the sidewall
top
and bottom boundaries. The sidewall share decreases whereas the top and bottom shares increase
indicating that surface insulation becomes necessary for large-scale systems to mitigate top-boundary heat loss. Heat-source temperature and borehole field scale jointly determine storage efficiency and the system's seasonal performance factor. Reduction of the heat source temperature may improve heat storage efficiency
but it increases the power consumption of the heat pump. Therefore
low-temperature borehole thermal energy storage offers greater economic advantages when electricity prices are low and heat source recovery costs are high. The findings provide guidance for borehole field sizing and heat-loss mitigation for seasonal BTES systems driven by low-grade heat sources.
中国建筑节能协会, 重庆大学. 中国城乡建设领域碳排放研究报告(2025)[R]. 2025.
江亿, 付林, 夏建军, 等. 构建新型零碳热力系统[J]. 中国工程科学, 2025, 27(5): 1-18. DOI:10.15302/J-SSCAE-2025.08.025.
JIANG Y, FU L, XIA J J, et al. Building a zero-carbon thermal system[J]. Strategic Study of Chinese Academy of Engineering, 2025, 27(5): 1-18. DOI:10.15302/J-SSCAE-2025.08.025.
冯国会, 田晓珂, 王茜如, 等. 地埋管跨季节储热技术研究与展望[J]. 太阳能学报, 2025, 46(8): 207-215. DOI:10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2024-0506.
FENG G H, TIAN X K, WANG X R, et al. Review and prospect of borehole thermal energy storage[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2025, 46(8): 207-215. DOI:10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2024-0506.
SALOUX E, CANDANEDO J A. Control-oriented model of a solar community with seasonal thermal energy storage: Development, calibration and validation[J]. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 2019, 12(5): 523-545. DOI:10.1080/19401493.2018. 1523950.
HELLSTRÖM G. UTES experiences from Sweden[R]. Sweden, 2016.
YAO S, WU J Z, QADRDAN M. A state-of-the-art analysis and perspectives on the 4th/5th generation district heating and cooling systems[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2024, 202: 114729. DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2024.114729.
FIGUEIRA J S, GARCÍA GIL A, VIEIRA A, et al. Shallow geothermal energy systems for district heating and cooling networks: Review and technological progression through case studies[J]. Renewable Energy, 2024, 236: 121436. DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2024.121436.
GUO F, YANG X D, XU L Y, et al. A central solar-industrial waste heat heating system with large scale borehole thermal storage[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2017, 205: 1584-1591. DOI:10.1016/j.proeng.2017.10.274.
NILSSON E, ROHDIN P. Performance evaluation of an industrial borehole thermal energy storage (BTES) project-Experiences from the first seven years of operation[J]. Renewable Energy, 2019, 143: 1022-1034. DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.020.
MESQUITA L, MCCLENAHAN D, THORNTON J, et al. Drake landing solar community: 10 years of operation[C]//Proceedings of SWC2017/SHC2017. October 29-November 2, 2017. Abu Dhabi. International Solar Energy Society, 2017: 1-12. DOI:10.18086/swc.2017.06.09.
ZHAO D L, CUI M Y, YANG S C, et al. Rapid temperature prediction model for large-scale seasonal borehole thermal energy storage unit[J]. Energies, 2025, 18(19): DOI:10.3390/en18195326.
贾鹏琦, 殷勇高, 张思雨, 等. 面向低碳供暖的城市中水余热跨季节储热系统性能分析[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 54(10): 4124-4134. DOI: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7207.2023.10.030.
JIA P Q, YIN Y G, ZHANG S Y, et al. Performance analysis of seasonal thermal energy storage system with urban reclaimed water waste heat for low-carbon heating[J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2023, 54(10): 4124-4134. DOI: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7207.2023.10.030.
RAPANTOVA N, POSPISIL P, KOZIOREK J, et al. Optimisation of experimental operation of borehole thermal energy storage[J]. Applied Energy, 2016, 181: 464-476. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy. 2016.08.091.
ZHU L, CHEN S, YANG Y, et al. Global sensitivity analysis on borehole thermal energy storage performances under intermittent operation mode in the first charging phase[J]. Renewable Energy, 2019, 143: 183-198. DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.010.
冯国会, 卢伟东, 王茜如, 等. 运行参数及间歇启停策略对地埋管蓄热性能的影响[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2025, 14(10): 3785-3795. DOI:10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2025.0373.
FENG G H, LU W D, WANG X R, et al. Influence of operational parameters and intermittent start-stop strategy on thermal storage performance of ground heat exchangers[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2025, 14(10): 3785-3795. DOI:10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2025.0373.
张思雨, 殷勇高, 贾鹏琦, 等. 双U型地埋管群跨季节蓄热特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 295-301. DOI:10.11949/0438-1157.20221623.
ZHANG S Y, YIN Y G, JIA P Q, et al. Study on seasonal thermal energy storage characteristics of double U-shaped buried pipe group[J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(S1): 295-301. DOI:10.11949/0438-1157.20221623.
GUO F, ZHU X Y, ZHANG J Y, et al. Large-scale living laboratory of seasonal borehole thermal energy storage system for urban district heating[J]. Applied Energy, 2020, 264: 114763. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114763.
杨曙川, 殷勇高, 李晓, 等. 基于湖/河水的跨季节/天混合储热技术实践与优化[J]. 制冷学报, 2025, 46(3): 1-10, 31. DOI: 10.12465/j.issn.0253-4339.2025.03.001.
YANG S C, YIN Y G, LI X, et al. Practice and optimization of seasonal/daily composite thermal energy storage technology based on lakes/rivers[J]. Journal of Refrigeration, 2025, 46(3): 1-10, 31. DOI: 10.12465/j.issn.0253-4339.2025.03.001.
HELLSTRÖM G. Duct ground heat storage model: manual for computer code[D]. Department of Mathematical Physics University of Lund, Lund, Sweden, 1989.
THORÉN Å. Practical evaluation of borehole heat exchanger models in TRNSYS[D]. Industrial Engineering and Management, KTH School, Stockholm, 2016.
AROMADA S A, ELDRUP N H, ERIK ØI L. Capital cost estimation of CO 2 capture plant using Enhanced Detailed Factor (EDF) method: Installation factors and plant construction characteristic factors[J ] . International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2021, 110: 103394. DOI:10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103394.
ZHOU W S, PEI P, MAO R Y, et al. Selection and techno-economic analysis of hybrid ground source heat pumps used in karst regions[J]. Science Progress, 2020, 103(2): 0036850420921682. DOI:10.1177/0036850420921682.
0
浏览量
15
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010102001997号